A U.S. Gaddafi treat him with gunshots and the dictator of Cuba give advice. Go contradiction! Is that Raul Castro has more legitimacy than Gaddafi?
While the bombs in Libya, Gaddafi was arrested four journalists from the New York Times. The government of the United States seems to have worried if the attacks of Tomahawk missiles could worsen the plight of these Americans. Gaddafi continued bombing and released them.
But in the case of Cuba, where more than a year ago have arrested a U.S. citizen ( Alan Gross ) and just arbitrarily sentenced to 15 years in prison, the Secretary of State of the United States, Hillary Clinton stated that "... We do not want to take any action or say anything that might undermine the possibilities that this person can return home to his family.''
This is the official said that along with Susan Rice and Samantha Power were instrumental in persuading President Obama a military strike against Qaddafi. United States, as is clear from the statements of Hillary Clinton, is a country subject to blackmail.
dictatorship now has invited President Jimmy Carter to Cuba to intercede in the kidnapping and returns with advice for Obama on the economic changes that the dictator Raul Castro has promised five years ago.
Tyranny Obama want to show that good manners are Carter more effective than keep talking about democracy and respect for human rights in Cuba.
It would seem that the president of the United States takes some liberties with respect to Cuba that bother Raul Castro. For example, during his tour of Latin America, the Obama asked support "the right of peoples to decide their future, including the people of Cuba."
Does it make sense word "including" ? Is there any other people in America who is suffering a totalitarian dictatorship?
Perhaps it would have been fairer and Obama was correct that the president reminded the American that had a village on the continent that had lost their freedom for over half a century and that people were worthy of the solidarity of all.
But no, President Obama instead advised Raul Castro: ... "Cuban authorities must take significant measures to respect the basic rights of Cubans, not because the U.S. insists on it, but because they Cubans deserve.
Obama on his tour said his government is the only one who has softened its policy toward the Cuban government, which has "The biggest changes in decades in policy toward Cuba" . What Obama has accomplished all of these different measures relative to tyranny? Among other things, the kidnapping of Gross.
In Cuba today there is more repression that when Obama came to the White House. The Castro regime has refused to make a political opening for the opposition. By contrast, pursues, insulted, harassed her. Released prisoners should have never spent a day in jail. That's not a political change.
True, Obama has declared its commitment to freedom and democracy in Cuba. No doubt their sincerity. He has said since before he became president, when asked for the votes of Cuban exiles.
Now, when you have two years of government, seems to have understood that dictators do not listen to advice from the Democrats. Obama should be more consistent with his statements.
If Castro's tyranny has not responded to his friendly measures, he warned that democracies will charge a price to regimes that do not respect human rights. The U.S. pressured Egypt's armed forces to replace Mubarak and now fight for democracy in Libya.
pumps for Gaddafi well. U.S. councils to tyranny in Cuba are interpreted as weakness by the Castro regime. Are counterproductive.
0 comments:
Post a Comment